Why We Crave Horror Paper

Essay 5 Position Paper50 pts translation4-5 pages, double-spaced, plus a separate MLA-format Works Cited page SkillsEverything Due prototypal DraftFriday, 10 celestial latitude (in-class discussion) Final DraftMonday, 13 December (Submit during Final Exam time 245-445pm) SourcesReading Critically, Writing wellhead (RC) pp. 517-534, 582-595 Stephen King, Why We Crave Horror, Crouch End Fritz Leiber, Smoke Ghost Algernon Blackwood, The alter House Noel Carroll, The Nature of Horror (optional)For your final paper, you will be required to make use of the above resources to explain, support, and defend your position against critique on the subject of horror in the absence of easily identifiable violence, gore, or monsters. You may argue with or against King and Carroll, or deliver the goods your protest definition of horror and how it anticipates gore-less horror better than previous definitions. Since there are no right or wrong answers in this discussion, you will be judged on th e strength of your argument for your position and how you present your analysis. Assignment ) commit the issue. Summarize the King and Carroll definitions of horror and their successes/failings. Establish your credibility by liberally discussing previous arguments on the function of horror. o Make sure to block emotional/personal opinions and instead stick to the texts. 2) Assert your position. Give examples from the readings that add up well/do not fit with the definition of horror as presented by King and Carroll. o Critique your own analysis use any of the Developing Your Argument skills (RC pp. 360-361), as well as Evaluating the logical system of an Argument (p. 24-640. 3) Argue directly for your position. Continue to establish your credibility with your interview by portraying how your position alters/upholds the definition of horror as established. o Be willing to take a side in the argument, scarce avoid setting up straw-man arguments for the opposition. Carroll an d/or King dont have to be wrong for you to be right.4) Critique any applicable counter-arguments, objections, questions, or alternatives. Since no position will be perfect, try to halt any concerns or issues relating to your discussion of horror. Options (you may choose one or all) ? Accommodation modify your position to suit relevant objections. ? Refutation show the reader that any likely alternatives will not be as strong in describing the function of horror as you see it. ? integrating demonstrate how your position can work together with other options to provide a more comprehensive take on the horror genre.Criteria for rating Analysis 20 points o Has a strong, focused explanation of the sources using RC skills learned so far. o Supports the initial thesis with evidence (i. e. expatiate from the source) and offers in-depth analysis of those details. Sources 10 points o Productively uses both the RC and the sources. o Features effective paraphrasing and selective quotati on. Organization 10 points o Offers strong topic sentences that logically develop and extend the analysis (i. e. , no random accumulation of facts or bullet-point narrative). o Proceeds logically from one point to the next in a climactic sequence. o Clearly links claims and evidence. o Uses debonnaire transitions between points. Readability 10 points o Uses correct grammar, spelling, punctuation, and MLA citation.