Culture Essay

First it would be profitable to look for to define gardening for a passionural studies researcher not solitary(prenominal) it includes conventional high farming (the culture of ruling social groups) and best-selling(predicate) culture but according to Raymond Williams also everyday meanings and practices. As say in Matthew Arnold? s Culture and Anarchy culture is the disinterested goal after mans perfection. It was James Clifford in compile art and culture that defended that what we gather for culture is not al way of lifes the very(prenominal) because objects of study vary according to power discourses which define the economic value of the analyze object.This being said, it is commonly known that we live in a era of consumption, so naturally art is seen from that perspective. Theodor Adorno defends culture is being sold as you would with commodities. The autonomy of works of art is eliminated by the culture industry they reverse bound to be trade as commodities. In a red ink view, he defends that those who control the means of production, essentially control the culture. Adorno approaches the spheres of mass culture in a simplistic way, production (industry) and reception (consumption) strip international individuality. Adorno also distinguishes high / low art.He says that high art has been minor by speculation ab prohibited its efficacy.. In this signified, high culture would be the art worth of serious academic study magical spell low culture would be the culture of the lot. Walter gum benzoin speaks about the way we define art is determined not by ideas but by theories. He reflects on what art is and the way it is being altered by technical means. W. Benjamin st humanities his essay by quoting Paul Valery our fine arts were developed by men whose power of action upon slimgs was insignifi back tootht in comparison with ours so it is close tothing questionable.In addition, Valery states that the idea of Beautiful is constantly ever-ch anging due to the growth in techniques and their precision. Benjamin corroborates this view by pointing out that techniques of representation detach the reproduced object from the domain of tradition and mass movements ar responsible for this, especially the picture palace. Although in his essay he states that the film doer captures the image at the speed of an actor? s speech, therefore showing us things we have never been able to notice before, analogous a gesture decomposed in several fractions of a second, it also manipulates masses its ultimate purpose is profit.The reproduction of works of art and the art of the film have had a huge impact on in its traditional form, as Benjamin puts it. Who hasn? t experienced this first-hand? Calling beforehand the example of painting, Benjamin points out that without its reproduction it would not be affable to so many, we will have to dislocate in order to be able to contemplate the original work . But copies diminish the vastness of the work of art. For example a symphony was trivialized from an auditory to the drawing populate. This calls to question the authority of the object. Copies of a work of art made it commodity.Without realizing the mountain lion was selling them to earn a living, although his ulterior motive was the artistic brass of it. But it became a commodity nonetheless. According to both texts there is no high culture today and little remains in the sense it was first created. W. Benjamin states that high culture always had a cult component and it was bound by it. Statues were made to be contemplated in temples, mosaics in churches. Works of art like statues and mosaics that cannot be mechanical reproduced thus unbroken up(p) their authenticity they are first and foremost related to cult value.When a work of art is related to exhibition value it loses its standard pressure because by reproducing the uniqueness of every reality we destroy the atmosphere. According to Benjamin high art would be the works of art that have an aura and can maintain their distance. If such a distance is not kept then true authenticity is questioned. An analysis of contemporary life sheds some light in this question. It brings us closer to every manifestation of art. He also states that contemporary literature is being undervalued. There is a thin dividing line between reader and writer. Virtually any reader can become a writer, once again closeness is implied.